Consider the outcome evaluation and consensus building required for PPP.

In PPP, pre-project evaluation has been emphasized. However, in recent years, from the viewpoint of verifying the outcome of the project, it has been recognized that it is necessary to evaluate during and after the project, and to accumulate and share the evidence and data obtained therefrom.
Also, as symbolized by "People-first PPPs (UN)" and "Inclusive Infrastructure(G20)", "Human-Centered Design" and inclusive consensus building are required to approach social issues in which various stakeholders are intricately intertwined.
Therefore, in the first half of the lecture, we will explain in detail the "Program Evaluation", which is a systematic method for outcome evaluation.
Next, from the perspective of human-centered design and inclusive consensus building, we explain design thinking and system thinking.
The second half of the lecture will be conducted in the form of a workshop. The purpose of this workshop is to promote a practical understanding of the techniques introduced in the first half of the lecture.

Understand the background of the tools and techniques learned in the lecture and practice them.

1. Guidance
2. Program Evaluation
3. Assessing needs and program theory
4. Logic Model and Theory of Change
5. Assessing efficiency
6. Monitoring and Performance-based contracts
7. Assessing the impact
8. Design Thinking
9. System Thinking
10. Inclusive Consensus building
11. Narrative Approaches
12. Workshop: Regional analysis
13. Workshop: Consideration of policies based on regional analysis
14. Discussion
15. Presentation of final report

Classes consist of lectures and discussions (assuming face-to-face/online lectures in the classroom).

・Pre-learning
Search for questions and issues that can be obtained from each practice and activity on the set theme.
・Post-learning
Consider the impacts and effects of each practice and activity obtained from the discussion.
The required time is about 30 to 60 minutes.

Evaluation items (Evaluation is based on Toyo University Graduate School Grading Standards).
・ Degree of active participation in discussions: 70%
・ End-of-term report (A4: 1 sheet): 30%
S score is 90 points or higher, and is generally within 10% of the students. A score is 80 points or more, B score is 70 points or more, C score is 60 points or more, and less than 60 points is rejected.

PPP students only

Lecture materials will be posted on ToyoNet-ACE in advance.

N/A

Digital Community (Mon7, Fall)

N/A

https://researchmap.jp/yoit/